£2,150-£3,250
$4,300-$6,500 Value Indicator
$3,900-$6,000 Value Indicator
¥20,000-¥30,000 Value Indicator
€2,600-€3,900 Value Indicator
$21,000-$30,000 Value Indicator
¥410,000-¥620,000 Value Indicator
$2,750-$4,150 Value Indicator
AAGR (5 years) This estimate blends recent public auction records with our own private sale data and network demand.
There aren't enough data points on this work for a comprehensive result. Please speak to a specialist by making an enquiry.
Medium: Lithograph
Edition size: 85
Year: 1965
Size: H 77cm x W 56cm
Signed: Yes
Format: Signed Print
TradingFloor
Watch artwork, manage valuations, track your portfolio and return against your collection
Auction Date | Auction House | Location | Hammer Price | Return to Seller | Buyer Paid |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
September 2024 | Phillips London | United Kingdom | |||
November 2023 | Sotheby's Online | United Kingdom | |||
October 2022 | Doyle Auctioneers & Appraisers | United States | |||
March 2022 | Sotheby's Online | United Kingdom | |||
February 2020 | Wilson55 | United Kingdom | |||
March 2019 | Christie's London | United Kingdom | |||
December 2015 | Aspire Auctions | United States |
Depicting a nude female figure, this 1965 lithograph by Hockney at first appears like a traditional print. However upon closer inspection it becomes obvious that the artist has subverted the genre, and the medium, to create something new. By placing a frame around the image, he adds both surface and depth, creating a trompe l’oeil barrier between the viewer and the image. The nude is part of a series entitled A Hollywood Collection, in which Hockney presents all the key elements of a traditional art historical collection – from portrait, to still life, to landscape to nude – in a series of fictitious frames. Here he uses the medium of lithography to achieve a sketchy style for the drawing as well as a more polished and tonal finish for the simple frame. Hockney is said to have been inspired to create the series while passing a shop window full of frames on his way to the Gemini print studio, where this series was produced. The addition of a trompe l’oeil deception is also said to have been a nod to the artifice of LA where the seemingly unchanging weather and modernist architecture presented a sharp contrast to the ‘greyness’ of the London he had left the year before.