Sunflower II
Sunflower II
Signed Print
David Hockney
£6,500-£10,000
$13,000-$20,000 Value Indicator
$11,500-$18,000 Value Indicator
¥60,000-¥90,000 Value Indicator
€8,000-€12,000 Value Indicator
$60,000-$100,000 Value Indicator
¥1,260,000-¥1,940,000 Value Indicator
$8,500-$13,000 Value Indicator
AAGR (5 years) This estimate blends recent public auction records with our own private sale data and network demand.
There aren't enough data points on this work for a comprehensive result. Please speak to a specialist by making an enquiry.
Medium: Intaglio
Edition size: 80
Year: 1995
Size: H 46cm x W 38cm
Signed: Yes
Format: Signed Print
TradingFloor
Track this artwork in realtime
Watch artwork, manage valuations, track your portfolio and return against your collection
Track auction value trend
Auction Results
| Auction Date | Auction House | Location | Hammer Price | Return to Seller | Buyer Paid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2022 | Phillips New York | United States | |||
| April 2022 | Phillips New York | United States | |||
| July 2021 | Forum Auctions London | United Kingdom | |||
| January 2021 | Phillips London | United Kingdom | |||
| June 2020 | Phi Auctions | United States | |||
| March 2018 | Bonhams Knightsbridge | United Kingdom | |||
| March 2015 | Sotheby's Online | United Kingdom |
Meaning & Analysis
Seemingly identical to Sunflower I by David Hockney, Sunflower II shows a still life of sunflowers in a pot against a plain background. Here however the black ink appears a little lighter and the image becomes charcoal soft, and yet retains much of the dynamism of the original. As well as a study from life of a subject – flowers – that Hockney loved and returned to throughout his career, the work can also be read as an homage to Dutch master Vincent van Gogh who Hockney had admired since he was young. Throughout his oeuvre Hockney constantly references artists who went before him – such as Picasso and Hogarth – but van Gogh stands out as an inspiration perhaps because Hockney compared his move to LA from london in 1964 to ‘van Gogh going to Arles’. In this way the work acts as a tribute to both the natural and fleeting beauty of flowers as well as the lessons learned by looking at still lifes by other artists which helped shape his eye for detail, space and light. These years of study reach their culmination in the 90s when this work was made, and continues today with Hockney’s prolific production of studies of flowers both in their natural habitats and in still lifes, on his iPad.
