£14,500-£22,000
$29,000-$45,000 Value Indicator
$26,000-$40,000 Value Indicator
¥130,000-¥200,000 Value Indicator
€18,000-€27,000 Value Indicator
$140,000-$220,000 Value Indicator
¥2,820,000-¥4,280,000 Value Indicator
$19,000-$28,000 Value Indicator
AAGR (5 years) This estimate blends recent public auction records with our own private sale data and network demand.
There aren't enough data points on this work for a comprehensive result. Please speak to a specialist by making an enquiry.
Medium: Photographic print
Edition size: 80
Year: 2000
Size: H 86cm x W 49cm
Signed: Yes
Format: Signed Print
TradingFloor
Watch artwork, manage valuations, track your portfolio and return against your collection
Auction Date | Auction House | Location | Hammer Price | Return to Seller | Buyer Paid |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sotheby's London | United Kingdom | ||||
Sotheby's London | United Kingdom | ||||
Sotheby's London | United Kingdom | ||||
Sotheby's London | United Kingdom | ||||
Sotheby's London | United Kingdom | ||||
Sotheby's London | United Kingdom | ||||
June 2024 | Phillips London | United Kingdom |
Onkel Rudi (Uncle Rudi) is a signed photographic print by an internationally acclaimed German painter Gerhard Richter. Created in 2000, the artwork displays Richter’s innovative way of thinking about portraiture as well as the relationship between painting and photography.
The artwork depicts Richter’s uncle, Rudi (Rudolf) Schönfelder, in full Wehrmacht dress uniform, in front of what looks like a concrete wall. Richter’s uncle was killed on the Western front in 1944, when Richter was twelve. The artwork engages with the themes of family and memory while displaying Richter’s signature technique of blurring the image by dragging a dry brush over the wet paint.
The artwork is a classic example of how Richter works with found imagery such as family snapshots and applies the paint directly to the photographic surface. The artist commented in this context: “It became clear to me that, although absurd and epigonic, copying a photo helped me to convey something new. It was of particular importance to me to disassociate myself from art made in the service of leftist politics… It was important that the viewer was not hit with some message or other in my works… For me it wasn’t at all about politics or family but rather about the banality and ambiguity of the source material.”