Happy Choppers
Happy Choppers
Signed Print
Banksy
£20,000-£40,000
$40,000-$80,000 Value Indicator
$35,000-$70,000 Value Indicator
¥190,000-¥390,000 Value Indicator
€23,000-€45,000 Value Indicator
$210,000-$420,000 Value Indicator
¥3,990,000-¥7,980,000 Value Indicator
$27,000-$50,000 Value Indicator
There aren't enough data points on this work for a comprehensive result. Please speak to a specialist by making an enquiry.
70 x 50cm, Edition of 150, Screenprint
Medium: Screenprint
Edition size: 150
Year: 2003
Size: H 70cm x W 50cm
Signed: Yes
Format: Signed Print
Last Auction: March 2024
Value Trend:
AAGR (5 years) This estimate blends recent public auction records with our own private sale data and network demand.
TradingFloor
Auction Results
Track auction value trend
Meaning & Analysis
First seen as a street artwork in London in 2002, Banksy's Happy Choppers prints as a signed edition of 150 screen-prints in 2003. Adorning military-grade helicopters with pink bows, Banksy draws attention to the crisis of civilians, especially children, under attack, in a typically sardonic and anti-war tinged sentiment.
The overt and sarcastic criticism of warfare and military activity is something we have come to expect from Banksy artwork. This humorous artwork depicts a hailstorm of gunships, possibly Apaches, approaching over the horizon. A bright blue sky behind them, and fluffy cartoonish clouds belies the oncoming danger. The helicopters are incredibly detailed, with particularly accurate recreation of the rotor blades and landing gear - which serves to accentuate the peril evoked by the artwork. One helicopter is wrapped in a cutesy baby pink ribbon, as though it were a gift, which could be interpreted as a tongue-in-cheek comment on politicians’ rhetoric, who preach that when they “export” their democracy, they consider it a gift to the citizens whose lives they are about to turn upside down through violent conflict.
Some more critical commentary blamed Happy Choppers for making light of war, however it is unlike Banksy to be so blasé about the loss and destruction associated with military activity and intervention, which is an issue he has been seriously advocating against in his artistic practice such as with powerful works like Love is in the Air (Flower Thrower).
